Harmon RL (2008) Aerodynamic modeling of a flapping membrane wing using motion tracking experiments. Shyy W, Berg M, Ljungqvist D (1999) Flapping and flexible wings for biological and micro air vehicles. Shyy W, Lian Y, Tang J, Viieru D, Liu H (2008) Aerodynamics of low Reynolds number flyers. Pelletier A, Mueller TJ (2000) Low Reynolds number aerodynamics of low-aspect-ratio, thin/flat/cambered-plate wings. Mittal S, Bhatt V, Srinath DN (2015) Aerodynamic shape optimization using stabilized finite element method. Kumar N, Diwakar A, Attree SK, Mittal S (2013) A method to carry out shape optimization with a large number of design variables. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(29):1976–1991ĭiwakar A, Srinath DN, Mittal S (2010) Aerodynamic shape optimization of airfoils in unsteady flow. Srinath DN, Mittal S (2010b) Optimal aerodynamic design of airfoils in unsteady viscous flows. Srinath DN, Mittal S (2010a) An adjoint method for shape optimization in unsteady viscous flows. Srinath DN, Mittal S, Manek V (2009) Multi-point shape optimization of airfoils at low Reynolds numbers. Srinath DN, Mittal S (2009) Optimal airfoil shapes for low Reynolds number flows. Srinath DN, Mittal S (2007) A stabilized finite element method for shape optimization in low Reynolds number flows. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 8(2):127–137 Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow 14(6):734–759Ībraham F, Behr M, Heinkenschloss M (2005) Shape optimization in steady blood flow: a numerical study of non-newtonian effects. Soto O, Löhner R, Yang C (2004) An adjoint-based design methodology for CFD problems. Nadarajah SK, Kim S, Jameson A, Alonso JJ (2003) Sonic boom reduction using an adjoint method for supersonic transport aircraft configurations. Jameson A (1989) Computational aerodynamics for aircraft design. Research Institute for Advanced Computer Science, NASA Ames Research Center Reuther J, Jameson A, Farmer J, Martinelli L, Saunders D (1996) Aerodynamic shape optimization of complex aircraft configurations via an adjoint formulation. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow 14(7):893–909 ![]() Mohammadi B (2004) Optimization of aerodynamic and acoustic performances of supersonic civil transports. Okumura H, Kawahara M (2000) Shape optimization of body located in incompressible Navier–Stokes flow based on optimal control theory. Int J Comput Fluid Dyn 19(1):45–51Īnderson WK, Venkatakrishnan V (1999) Aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured grids with a continuous adjoint formulation. Katamine E, Azegami H, Tsubata T, Itoh S (2005) Solution to shape optimization problems of viscous flow fields. Giles MB, Pierce NA (2000) An introduction to the adjoint approach to design. Mohammadi B, Pironneau O (2004) Shape optimization in fluid mechanics. One of the optimal shapes leads to 50 % increase in lift coefficient and 23 % increase in aerodynamic efficiency compared to the Mueller C4 airfoil. ![]() Shape optimization of the Mueller C4 airfoil is carried out using various objective functions and optimization strategies, based on controlling airfoil thickness and camber. ![]() Each of the later corrugations leads to a reduction in drag. The first corrugation causes an increase in lift and drag. Computations are carried out for different location and number of corrugations, while holding their height fixed. A novel parameterization scheme is proposed that enables representation of corrugations on the surface of the airfoil, and their spontaneous appearance in the shape optimization loop, if indeed they improve aerodynamic performance. A stabilized finite element method is employed to solve the incompressible flow equations in two dimensions. The effect of corrugations on the aerodynamic performance of a Mueller C4 airfoil, placed at a \(5^000\), is investigated.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |